Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale

Not to burst your bubble, but I know a Chem professor or two who would view "physics" as less than concrete as well.

Given the apparent arbitrary characteristics that certain molecules (and even numbers of molecules) display, they give solid reasoning to state that any focus in science is as good as any school of philosophy. (And science BEING a philosophy is even easier to understand)


33 posted on 06/08/2005 3:37:53 PM PDT by MacDorcha (In Theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: MacDorcha
Chemistry has come a long way. The more math they put in it, such as in crystallography or chromatography, the better, even if it isn't cosmology.

But, some philosophers might regard science as unfortunate and ultimately futile, something some of the more reflective and mature scientists might do as well.

36 posted on 06/08/2005 4:20:13 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: MacDorcha
Who really understands friction?

Clumps of small numbers of molecules or atoms often have radically different chemical and physical properties than the mega-numbers assumed in the CRC for solids, liquids and gases.

46 posted on 06/08/2005 6:11:04 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson