Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/08/2005 7:15:34 AM PDT by EarthStomper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EarthStomper

"Congress for instance insists that the Homeland Security Department hand out the greater portions of budget in grants to state and local governments and private sector companies. But the mission of the Department of Homeland Security is to prevent another September 11, not to subsidize local fire stations. A dollar spent on preventing the next terror attack is vastly superior to spending dollars on recovering in the aftermath of an attack. In that sense, over investing in federal homeland security grant programs -- especially the first responder grants -- at the expense of the department's other priorities is not making us safer. "


Exactly.


2 posted on 06/08/2005 7:20:14 AM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper

We can afford the Congressional PORK SPENDING but we cannot afford agents and A CLOSED BORDER to protect our SECURITY? Do I smell hypocrisy here? Congress fiddles while the U.S. burns ??


3 posted on 06/08/2005 7:26:45 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson