Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antisocial
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1418154/posts This might explain it for you.

Ok, the article is in favor of free trade, just as I am. So you lack what one generally refers to as a point. Since I was responding to someone who was "anti-free trade" it hardly makes sense to make me see the light by showing me an article that agrees with me. If your problem is with free trade agreements, and not free trade, then that is a totally diffirent animal, one of which wasn't under discussion here.
69 posted on 06/08/2005 10:28:53 PM PDT by Republic of Reagan (Welcome to Reagan Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Republic of Reagan

"Ok, the article is in favor of free trade, just as I am. So you lack what one generally refers to as a point. Since I was responding to someone who was "anti-free trade" it hardly makes sense to make me see the light by showing me an article that agrees with me. If your problem is with free trade agreements, and not free trade, then that is a totally diffirent animal, one of which wasn't under discussion here."

The whole point is that what they are calling "free trade"
ie CAFTA, NAFTA etc. have nothing to do with free trade. They (NAFTA, CAFTA, FTAA) are TREATIES that give UN agencies
the authority to regulate trade within the various nations involved. That is a pact with the devil as far as I am concerned.


89 posted on 06/09/2005 9:50:48 AM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson