Replies

"Biblical truth best serves the well-being of our country, in accordance with the vision of our founding fathers."

Despite your protestations to the contrary.
It can mean nothing else than what it says.

You make a distinction that is without a difference when you try to change the focus to being only the 'culture' they are trying to govern... because they believe the founders intended for this to be a biblical Christian nation... if words like the ones above from their website mean anything.

Religion in government has a lot of support these days from a lot of the newer freepers.
Don't count on it from all of us however. Some of us want less government, in EVERY area of our lives. Including government posing in the role of morality police.

"Biblical truth best serves the well-being of our country, in accordance with the vision of our founding fathers."

Despite your protestations to the contrary. It can mean nothing else than what it says.

It does means what it says, and what it says is not a call for a theocratic government as you seem to believe.

You are entitled to your opinion of the organization, but you can't change the meaning of it's statement to accommodate your biased opinion. Do you deny that the principles of justice, honesty, personal integrity, morality, etc, that are embodied in the "Biblical truth" referred to in the AFA statement are "according to the vision of the founding fathers"? If so, then we hold radically different views of the founders' character, intentions, and vision for their new nation.