Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nonstatist
Far more than half of China has a standard of living worse than many third world nations. Its ridiculous to compare apples and oranges.

What this seems to say is you're not interested in comparing the growth of world economies but prefer to measure the "standard of living" of various groups within some inconvenient national border.  What is the advantage in doing that?

48 posted on 06/07/2005 10:57:48 PM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Racehorse
you're not interested in comparing the growth of world economies ?

I'd be interested in comparing the growth rate of "like-sized" economies, but theres no economy in the world that is even half the size of ours or at our level of maturity (re infrastructure, delivery of services, etc), so its apples and oranges. Go figure !

86 posted on 06/08/2005 7:30:19 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson