Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot

But I don't think the article is using it in that sense. They've simply taken the gdp value between the start and end of ten years and thrown at us the figure of 108%.


251 posted on 06/08/2005 5:10:19 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]


To: CarrotAndStick
But I don't think the article is using it in that sense.

It's not a matter of how the article uses it. If they grew 108% over 10 years that's the same as 7.6% every year for 10 years, not 10.8% like you stated.

256 posted on 06/08/2005 6:11:59 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Karl Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: CarrotAndStick
In May, the Bush economy eked out a paltry 73,000 private sector jobs

That only covers a week and a half of new immigrants. What are the other 127,000 immigrants that enter our labor force in May going to do? What are unemployed americans going to do if we are creating fewer jobs than the number of new immigrants entering our labor force?

284 posted on 06/08/2005 8:59:04 PM PDT by SandyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson