Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: carl in alaska
B I N G O

This is because the fuel is carefully manufactured so that it cannot explode in fight. If there was even the slightest chance that a 747 could exploded spontaneously, do you think the Air Force would still be using a 747 as Air Force One?

Of course, one person that I know pointed out that Air Force One and TWA 800 were both of the same 747-200 series. He was questioned by the Secret Service because of this factual comment.

73 posted on 06/07/2005 11:39:31 PM PDT by Hunble (U.S. Army for 20 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Hunble
"Of course, one person that I know pointed out that Air Force One and TWA 800 were both of the same 747-200 series. He was questioned by the Secret Service because of this factual comment."

Maybe they just wanted to give him more accurate information. To start with, TWA 800 was a 747-100. Not a 200. And it was built almost 20 years before the 747's used to transport the President. Air Force one is such a highly modified 747-200 it is essentially a unique airframe.

76 posted on 06/08/2005 6:08:23 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson