Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
You're not alone. O'Connor regained some sanity. Scalia lost his. Kennedy is out to lunch as usual.

That pretty well sums it up for me, too.

So, why did we need an 18th Amendment prohibiting "intoxicating liquors" which must surely have some effect on interstate commerce, given the majority's line of reasoning? (And the 22nd Amendment repealing the 18th was also unnecessary, no?)

24 posted on 06/07/2005 3:44:56 PM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: nonsporting; Abram; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; blackeagle; ...
Well, the 18th Amendment was because...well, you know...because...

Freepatriot32's Libertarian Ping List

27 posted on 06/07/2005 4:02:20 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (<-- sick of faux-conservatives who want federal government intervention for 'conservative things.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson