Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mabelkitty

yeah but Newsweek had its own unnamed source that recanted

we all know the internet AND the MSM media can be notoriously unreliable

let's just agree we are all speculating at this point because we just are saddened and horrified that it looks like this case isn't going to have a happy ending and we want to see justice done....

until you get official police statements and even then, the facts can change because the police are relying on certain witnesses and evidence which could be found to be unreliable or discredited later or have another explanation


224 posted on 06/07/2005 4:35:54 PM PDT by littlelilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: littlelilac

I'll tell you this - if they steamroll two working-class black men and ignore the three who saw her last, that will be the biggest outrage.

Now here's my question - why did the three "admit" to sex with her right off? It really wasn't germane to the investigation, right? Wouldn't a normal person withold that information until it became critical? They could have said we saw the lighthouse and then saw her with two security guards. If you were innocent, you'd put distance between them and you right off, right?

However, if you knew there was no chance anybody elses DNA was going to be on/in her, well then you'd have to explain it right away. Afterall, they know the security guards didn't have sex with her. It's a statement that says they knew the guards didn't have sex with her.


249 posted on 06/07/2005 4:54:27 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson