Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Bret doesn't have the money behind him for advertising that Forrester has.

I have received one mailshot from Schundler and nine mailshots from Forrester. The one I got from Schundler was a solid platform statement. The nine I got from Forrester's campaign have been a mix of:

two (2) that focussed on a 30% property tax cut promise.

seven (7) that were a negative campaign against Schundler, and which quoted liberal news sources for its "proof" of Schundler's (supposedly) terrible record.

That Forrester would run a negative campaign against someone who might become his own party's candidate speaks volumes. That he is solidly anti-RKBA and Bret is largely pro-RKBA is also clear.


29 posted on 06/07/2005 9:39:13 AM PDT by dsmcf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: dsmcf
I have been inundated with mail, phone calls and e-mails from Forrester. If I hadn't already been for Schundler, the amount of money that Forrester is wasting on mailings would have made me vote against him, anyway. The 6th phone call on a Saturday morning was enough to turn you against anyone and there can be no doubt this guy will be a big spender, which translates to a big taxer. I think all the advertising could work against Forrester
35 posted on 06/07/2005 9:55:48 AM PDT by Barb4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson