"Schundler's links to radical Muslim groups totally disqualifies him from my support. He is buddies with the worst elements of that crowd, who we bash day in and out here on FR."
Could you please give us some evidence of this? It seems odd that Schundler's links to al Qaeda-type groups have gone unnoticed until now, and that someone who worked in Israel for years is actually a Muslim sympathizer.
"Longean is a better choice, but Forrester is the only real choice to win, because Lonegan lacks sufficient cash."
Lonegan's problem isn't that he doesn't have the cash for the general election---if he won the primary, he'd be able to raise it in a hurry. Lonegan's problem is that he's at between 5%-8% in every poll, and thus has no chance of winning the primary. Conservatives need to decide whether they want Forrester or Schundler to win; if they want a pro-abortion moderate such as Forrester, they can vote for him or for the conservatives Lonegan or Murphy and Schundler will not be able to beat Forrester. But if they want a conservative to win, they need to vote for Schundler, the one conservative who can win today's primary.
I grow increasingly irritated with all of these baseless accusations of Schundler and "terrorist groups."
I really want to know which candidate started these disgusting rumors. It's either Forrester or Lonegan- only those two would lack enough class to throw around something so ridiculous.