Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: leepbutler
They were absolutely petrified that America had turned against liberalism and was embracing Conservatism.

I think that's quite a leap. Nixon was not conservative, at least not much moreso than J. F. Kennedy, and in some areas, notably less so. What he mostly was, was part of a different power structure.

2 posted on 06/06/2005 1:32:20 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lepton

The media at that time considered Nixon to be the personification of Conservatism... today we realize that in effect he really wasn't, but that doesn't matter in the context of how Nixon was perceived by the media, and that perception also continues to this day. For them to now make him out to be something else would be for them to destroy the legacy they have worked to create.


3 posted on 06/06/2005 1:36:39 PM PDT by leepbutler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: lepton

Remember that there was essentially no social conservatism in 1972 (Roe hadn't yet begun to shape it); Nixon was as close to "conservative" as it was known in those days, and it started long before his terms as Veep. "Conservative" was anticommunist, and Nixon had earned his stripes against Hiss. If he hadn't been PERCEIVED as conservative, his negotiations with the Soviets and Chinese could not have happened. The media, steeped in liberalism since the mid-fifties, hated Nixon every bit as much as they hated Taft or Reagaon or, when they DARED, Bill Buckley.


11 posted on 06/06/2005 2:27:47 PM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson