To: Righty_McRight
The Russians have some cheesy version of this tied to the fire control systems aboard the Mig-29. A real POS, but at least they made the attempt.
To: in hoc signo vinces
I imagine this is a leeeeetle more sophisticated than your typical Rooski hardware.
In Hoc? A Sig are we?
4 posted on
06/06/2005 12:34:16 PM PDT by
AngryJawa
(Will Work For Ammo)
To: in hoc signo vinces
We had VTAS in the F-4 when I was a young lootnik. Very cumbersome and almost worthless unless everybody used it. You had to force the ops/supply/maintencance system to make it work, but many wouldn't do it because they were just waiting for the Phantoms to go away.
9 posted on
06/06/2005 12:46:23 PM PDT by
paddles
To: in hoc signo vinces
From what I read a decade ago, we had tried it in the early '80's but didn't keep at it. The Russians did. They made it work.
After the Fall of the Soviet empire, when our pilots co-trained with the Germans with Soviet hardware, OUR pilots said that any pilot with a helmet-mounted sight, even in a Cessna with a missile, could shoot down one of ours...the helmet mounted system kicked butt and we were behind them at that time. Not now.
13 posted on
06/06/2005 1:09:11 PM PDT by
Imnidiot
(THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson