Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SittinYonder
The point about using shame was made facetiously. I should have made it more obvious that I find the campaign against smoking to be stupid because we simultaneously subsidize the growing of tobacco.

But I do stand by my statement regarding the social and economic costs of legal drugs like alcohol. While I don't want to stop my neighbor from drinking beer in mass quantities, I also don't want him or her to beat their spouses or drive cars. As a former public defender, I saw many of these otherwise good "neighbors" do some pretty awful things while exercising their freedom to kill their own brain cells. BTW, don't make assumptions that everyone who visits FR is a Repussican (or a dummycrat) unless you've seen the voter registration rolls.

36 posted on 06/06/2005 10:01:37 AM PDT by Che Chihuahua (Is a former domestic terrorist (specifically a former KKK grand dragon) fit to serve in the Senate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Che Chihuahua
But I do stand by my statement regarding the social and economic costs of legal drugs like alcohol.

I wouldn't stand by that, either. You're not weighing all the costs and benefits of the WOD if you think it "costs" more to keep drugs illegal. In terms of money alone you've got to factor in all the expenditures of drug enforcement at the state, local and federal level. You've got to factor in the costs of building and maintaining prisons. You've also got to factor intangible costs such as the lost production for those who are incarcerated. The costs to legalize are far smaller than the costs to maintain the war on drugs.

44 posted on 06/06/2005 10:54:14 AM PDT by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson