[dirtboy]

Despite the Constitution limiting the federal government to regulating commerce between the several state, the Court today, once again, rules that it includes commerce wholly within a state.

And, as Thomas pointed out in his dissent, there wasn't even any commerce involved whatsoever. So what SCOTUS just upheld was the right of the federal government to regulate just about any ACTIVITY within a state.

[jwalsh07]

So what SCOTUS just upheld was the right of the federal government to regulate just about any ACTIVITY within a state.

Consistent with Lawrence.

[tacticalogic]

And, as Thomas pointed out in his dissent, there wasn't even any commerce involved whatsoever. So what SCOTUS just upheld was the right of the federal government to regulate just about any ACTIVITY within a state.

I'm waiting for someone, anyone, who supports this to post something from the majority decision that lays out a constitutional argument for the decision that is defensible from a constitutionally conservative perspective. So far it's all been emotional tripe.

[Destro]

Thomas dissented on this case? My respect for teh man went up 10fold.