Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kjam22

The difference is that there is no federal constitutional right to same sex marriage, but state and federal courts may try to impose it on the other states through other constitutional provisions, including the 14th amendment. These ballot initiatives are wholly applicable within each state because they are based on people-passed laws, not based on constitutional interpretations. So, they would not impact other states.


247 posted on 06/06/2005 9:08:28 AM PDT by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: holdonnow
There's no federal constitutional right to smoking marijuana. But courts may try to impose that right on other states through the 14th. The exact same can be said.

There is no federal constitutional right to smoke marijuana. And our elected represenatives have voted by the will of the people that this activity is illegal. I think the court ruled correctly in supporting what our duly elected represenatives have legislated.

258 posted on 06/06/2005 9:11:28 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson