Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BCR #226
And if it doesn't help "restore the Constitution," that is, it only results in "pot heads" getting free access to their dope? If it doesn't do a thing to preserve the rights of gun owners (which has absolutely nothing to do with marijuana)?

Are you in favor of it then?

15 posted on 06/06/2005 6:34:14 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: JCEccles

If the Court finds against the defendant in Raich, that means that Interstate Commerce will be carried out to the extreme even if it means violating every Amendment of the Constitution. If the court decides for Raich, then they decide the opposite for Stewart, then there is a disparity in the law that can be challenged...

The case is all about interstate commerce... that is the key.

Mike


20 posted on 06/06/2005 6:44:49 AM PDT by BCR #226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson