Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/05/2005 10:09:44 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: YaYa123

This might interest you!


2 posted on 06/05/2005 10:16:00 PM PDT by StarFan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Now if only we can get the MSM to carry this.


3 posted on 06/05/2005 10:52:44 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (</liberal> It's time the left - left!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Right ON!!!!


4 posted on 06/05/2005 10:54:53 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Thanks. Save for later.


7 posted on 06/05/2005 11:21:18 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

And .. about 4-5 years ago, the Jerusalem Post wrote a story about the moat that Syria had built around Damascus. Inside the moat were scud missles - aimed at Israel.

Evidently, it was the NK's who helped Syria get the technology and armament to propel their scuds to the desired destination. Isaiah 17:1 is coming all too soon.


8 posted on 06/05/2005 11:34:04 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Thank you for posting this- How do you manage to dig up all this stuff?


9 posted on 06/05/2005 11:45:44 PM PDT by de Buillion (Ready, Fire, Aim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
"was trying to convince people that there are weapons of mass destruction in Syria, at a time when there was no evidence of that."

Classic Catch-22

"We should look for evidence of weapons of mass destruction"

"There is no evidence of weapons of mass destruction, so we shouldn't look"

11 posted on 06/06/2005 3:46:14 AM PDT by Flyer ( We have a no tolerance stance on making claims without authentic proof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
This quote was telling:

"Which brings us back to Mr. Bolton, who has been denied a Senate confirmation vote because, among other charges, he challenged accepted intelligence wisdom. In the Syrian case, Senator Dodd and his comrade-in-filibuster Joe Biden concede that Mr. Bolton's final testimony to Congress on Syria's WMD was accurate and cleared with the State Department....

"As it happens, Messrs. Dodd and Biden both voted in favor of the 2003 Syrian Accountability Act. That law explicitly cites an unclassified CIA report that Syria "already holds a stockpile of the nerve agent sarin but apparently is trying to develop more toxic and persistent nerve agents. . . ." The law also notes that "Syria also is developing an offensive [biological weapons] capability."....

"By now it should be clear to anyone who has followed this nomination that the fight here isn't over Mr. Bolton's record, his temperament or his reading of the intelligence. Rather, it is a policy dispute in which a majority of Democrats, as well as a few Republicans, have chosen to hijack the nomination process to score some points against President Bush's foreign policy. In the case of Syria, they owe both Mr. Bolton and Mr. Bush an apology. Americans need to understand the threat Syria poses to our troops in Iraq and to our allies in the region. That understanding isn't helped when Senators put their partisan animus ahead of the national interest."


COMMENT: We'll see if on their upcoming roadshow the 9/11 Commission chairmen will criticize obstructionist senators Dodd and Biden for their attacks on Bolton, who is showing the "imagination" the Commission deemed necessary to fight the War on Terror. It would be interesting to have them explain how Bolton's challenging of accepted intelligence is contrary to their recommendations? More likely, wimpy Gov. Kean will cave once again.
12 posted on 06/06/2005 5:45:25 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE


Members of Sept. 11 Panel Press for Information on Terror Risk (NYT): The 9/11 panelists are regrouping to review progress in dealing with terrorist threats. From left, Lee H. Hamilton, vice chairman; Thomas H. Kean, chairman; and Fred F. Fielding, a panel member, in May 2004.
13 posted on 06/06/2005 5:55:07 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE


A Teary-Eyed Rebel Defies Party Leaders (NYT): Senator George V. Voinovich, left, greeting Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. after a committee vote on President Bush's choice for United Nations ambassador, John R. Bolton. Mr. Voinovich opposes the nomination.
14 posted on 06/06/2005 5:57:12 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE



Delaware Senator Joe Biden is concerned that his anti-Bolton coalition may dwindle in the coming weeks resulting in the confirmation of President Bush's nominee to be Ambassador to the U.N.:

Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr., Delaware Democrat and ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on ABC's "This Week" that he doubted his anti-Bolton caucus would be able to hold together indefinitely.

Asked whether there were enough votes to keep the filibuster going, Mr. Biden said: "I don't know."

"I'm going to be completely straight with you," he said. "I'm not at all certain we do."

-- Source: fromthebleachers.blogspot.com
15 posted on 06/06/2005 8:28:57 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson