Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: porte des morts
Why remove the nitrogen? Leave it in, sell the water to farmers to spread on crops, cheaper than buying fertilizer.

You clearly have not been exposed to the joys of the Clean Water Act and ammendments. The biggest problem with your suggestion is the daily volume of water involved. It would be impractical to transport several hundred thousand gallons per day. Also, there are strict regulations in place for land irrigation in order to avoid runoff. Second, its illegal to irrigate crops for human or animal consumption with treated wastewater without jumping through mucho hoops first (if even then).

12 posted on 06/05/2005 3:39:28 PM PDT by lafroste (gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: lafroste

But aren't the byproducts 99.9999% pathogen free.?


13 posted on 06/05/2005 4:07:30 PM PDT by porte des morts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: lafroste
also from the above article; He no longer has to buy commercial fertilizer for his farm fields, and he can spread the liquid manure all summer long rather than waiting until fall.

They seem to be doing it in WI.Your'e problem may be in the amount of water coming from pig effluent as opposed to cow. Is there a way to evaporate the majority of the water to leave a usable product?

15 posted on 06/05/2005 4:13:28 PM PDT by porte des morts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson