Replies

Once again, I'm from Alabama.

So, my guy is on the court because of the deal, therefore, you're going to be hard pressed to find me criticize a deal that put a man on the court whose campaign fund I had contributed to. (when he ran for AG, both times) A man I know personally for that matter.

As I told my two Senators, I don't care what has to be done, I want Pryor on the court.

And he's there, so, I'm more than happy. And maybe, if Bush has a last minute pick for SC in 2008, he'll nominate Pryor.

Now, politically, I know full well that the Democrats are going to renege on the deal. But when they do renege, who will be hurt...... The Democrats.

If we had pushed the option while Democrats were playing victim, who could have been possibly hurt...... The Republicans

It's all about picking battles. What McCain and Graham did was give the Democrats enough rope to hang themselves, because as soon as that SC nomination comes up, thats what they're gonna do

Pryor has NOT been voted on yet. As a matter of fact, there is no guarantee that he will be confirmed. Brown is up next, so how is it that you can claim, with a straight face, that Pryror is now on the bench ?

Is this an act, or are you REALLY this uninformed and such a political naif ?