Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: judgemc
Since when, in the last 20-30 years can we believe what is printed. At some point, one must go with their gut feeling. I have heard newspaper guys (3) agree that in order to get an even representation, they had to print all three of the anti letters they received just to get an 'even' representation of the opinions. I f*rt in their direction. When everyone you meet shares the same thoughts, it's a good bet that it's got some validity.

Nam Vet

26 posted on 06/04/2005 10:11:09 PM PDT by Nam Vet (There are two theories to arguing with women. Neither one works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Nam Vet

Yes I would ordinarily agree, but I have been reading this paper for years and know for an absolute fact that it is a highly conservative paper. If the editor says the letters that she has been recieving (not printing, recieving) have split about 50/50, I'm inclined to beleive her. Also, I find it strangly humorous that we are arguing over the validitly of what a newspaper prints while responding to a newspaper article that was posted.


30 posted on 06/04/2005 10:15:37 PM PDT by judgemc (My judicial sense is tingling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson