Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Valentine

You know, the funny thing is that all these stories say "Intel", but none of them really specify x86. It would be funny if they had something else in mind, maybe I2 or some such. That would be a major shocker. ;)


24 posted on 06/04/2005 4:01:09 PM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: general_re
The new Intel and AMD chips are not x86 based, I believe they haven't been for a a year or so. They have a "x86 wrapper" for backwards compatibility.
33 posted on 06/04/2005 6:46:03 PM PDT by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: general_re
the funny thing is that all these stories say "Intel", but none of them really specify x86

Right. The only way this makes sense to me is if Intel will start building PPC-compatible CPUs. From discussions I've read elsewhere this is somewhat plausible; Intel's current chips are essentially a RISC core with an x86 translator in front, so it might not be that hard to switch the translator to PPC. It would still be a major undertaking, but I can believe that more easily than that Apple will instantly obsolete their entire installed base.

73 posted on 06/05/2005 10:52:29 AM PDT by ThinkDifferent (These pretzels are making me thirsty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson