Replies

Perhaps if you were to burn me at a stake, you could finally make me recant my positions about scientific hostility.

Thank you for acknowledging the meaning of "theory", and again validating my point by using the term crackpot in reference to those to which you disagree.

I'm delighted that you can read my mind concerning ID. Do you have any other paranormal skills that you would like to share? What is hilarious is that you keep bolstering my point by arguing against a point I never made. It is quite feasible for someone to be a devout Darwinian apostle and agree with me.

"Perhaps if you were to burn me at a stake, you could finally make me recant my positions about scientific hostility."

Good point, I'll look into it.

"Thank you for acknowledging the meaning of "theory", and again validating my point by using the term crackpot in reference to those to which you disagree"

All theories do not all deserve the same respect. Evolution deserves tremendous respect because it has withstood scrutiny for almost 150 years. For a competing theory to seriously challenge the validity of it they must provide strong evidence against it. ID does no such thing.

"I'm delighted that you can read my mind concerning ID. Do you have any other paranormal skills that you would like to share?"

I don't need to read your mind to know what your opinion of ID vs. Evolution is. Just as ID advocates don't need to say explicitly that they are talking about a Christian God when they say *intelligent designer*. They don't mean the Hindu pantheon.