Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brokaw Chides Buchanan for Calling Felt "Traitor," But He Didn't (Chris Matthews)
MRC ^ | Friday June 3, 2005 | Brent Baker

Posted on 06/03/2005 2:42:36 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay

Will Tom Brokaw, the Today show, Chris Matthews and CBS's Early Show offer a correction? As Brit Hume noted Thursday night, the Washington Post corrected a Wednesday article which reported, that on Hardball Tuesday night, Pat Buchanan had called Mark Felt a "traitor." The correction explained: "Buchanan said that Felt had no personal loyalty to President Richard M. Nixon, 'so I don't consider him a traitor in that sense.'" In fact, it was Matthews who first falsely claimed that Buchanan had tagged Felt a "traitor." On Wednesday's Today, Brokaw was appalled by Buchanan's supposed characterization: "I think Pat said yesterday that Mark Felt was a 'traitor.' A traitor to what? The truth?!" On CBS's Early Show the same day, Wyatt Andrews asserted: "Several former aides to President Nixon still argue what Felt did was wrong with one aide, Pat Buchanan, calling Felt a 'traitor.'"

Hume's June 2 "Grapevine" item on FNC's Special Report with Brit Hume: "The Washington Post reported yesterday that after learning that Deep Throat was actually former FBI number-two Mark Felt, quote 'former Nixon speechwriter Patrick J. Buchanan labeled Felt a 'traitor' for having worked with reporters on stories that did severe damage to the administration.' What's more, while chatting with readers about it online later in the day, one Washington Post reporter called Buchanan's reaction quote, 'darkly hilarious.' But Buchanan never called Felt a traitor. In fact, in an interview with Chris Matthews, Buchanan said that because Felt had no personal loyalty to Nixon quote, 'I don't consider him a traitor in that sense.' The Post has now issued a correction."

Indeed, the June 2 Post carried this correction on page A2: "A June 1 article on reaction to the confirmation that former FBI official W. Mark Felt was the Watergate source known as 'Deep Throat' incorrectly said that Patrick J. Buchanan called Felt a 'traitor' in an interview on MSNBC's Hardball. Buchanan said that Felt had no personal loyalty to President Richard M. Nixon, 'so I don't consider him a traitor in that sense.'" That's posted at: www.washingtonpost.com

Full story: http://www.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2005/cyb20050603.asp#3


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brithume; cbs; chrismatthews; earlyshow; hardball; lesleystahl; markfelt; mrc; msnbc; nixon; patbuchanan; tombrokaw; washingtonpost; wyattandrews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Peach

You should hear the media/press on Hardball right now


41 posted on 06/03/2005 4:48:50 PM PDT by Mo1 (Hey GOP ---- Not one Dime till Republicans grow a Spine !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hogwild

Ben Stein said he was Jewish...not Pat......and someone that Richard Nixon asked on the tapes.


42 posted on 06/03/2005 5:02:21 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: hogwild
"If that make me a traitor, then so be it. I'm a patriotic American."

Thank you. That's been my take on this subject ever since it broke. Anybody who goes over the head of their immediate supervisor to report their immediate supervisor's misconduct to their immediate supervisor's immediate supervisor is just asking to get canned.

Felt was in a tough jam. If I had been in his shoes at the time I would have done just as he did, but in the open. He obviously couldn't have gone up the chain of command because everyone above him was suspect. So he went to the media and kept his mouth shut for 30 years.

That's the part which makes him a coward. He exposed the wrong-doing of the Nixon administration but didn't have the balls to take the credit for it. Terrorists and assassins regularly take public credit for their deeds, but Felt didn't. His motives with regard to the above-mentioned facts speak volumes about his actions between Watergate and the recent happenings.

43 posted on 06/03/2005 5:02:21 PM PDT by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hogwild

I'll bite...who's Hal Turner?


44 posted on 06/03/2005 5:03:14 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Chrissy Matthews beat up Alexadra Polosi the other day also, and he beat up some other woman besides Malkin also. BULLY BOY.


45 posted on 06/03/2005 5:05:07 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CDB
That reminds me of the old story useful in telling hypothetical and theoretical apart:

Son comes to father and asks, "Dad, what's the difference between theoretical and hypothetical?"

"Son, I'll illustrate that most illuminatingly to you if you'll ask your mother and sister a question."

"Sure Dad, what do you want me to ask them?"

"Ask them if they'll have sex with a man for a million dollars."

Son comes back with a perplexed look on his face. "Well, did you get an answer to the question?"

"Yes, I did Dad. Mom said that it would have to be much more than a million dollars because you're a really swell guy, but that she'd share it with you. Sis said that she'd do it merely if the guy had a million dollars, and only bought her a big diamond ring, a house with a fancy shrubbery out front (you know one with two levels and a nice walkway between the two levels), a shiny red Ferrari, and big English Sheep dog for the backyard, and for he to be able to help you and mom out financially when you get older."

"Well, there you have it son, I hope its all clear in your mind now."

"What, Dad? I don't see how that helps at all?"

"Don't you see son? We, hypothetically could be a couple of millionaires, but are theoretically living with a couple of prostitutes."

46 posted on 06/03/2005 5:06:39 PM PDT by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Tonite, Richard Cohen first called Pat a criminal, the Chrissy corrected him, then Cohen called him The Criminally INSANE!!


47 posted on 06/03/2005 5:07:14 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

http://www.polyconomics.com/searchbase/01-13-99.html
January 13, 1999
The Impeachment of Richard Nixon

Memo To: A Newsweek columnist
From: Jude Wanniski
Re: Comparing impeachments


48 posted on 06/03/2005 6:07:45 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Woodward said Felt was very concerned for security. With that in mind, how could Felt acting alone have monitored the pot on Woodwards balcony and intercepted Woodwards morning delivery of The New York Times? If he was so concerned about security, he had to assume that not only he but also Woodward and Berstein were under surveillance. By regularly checking on the location of Woodwards flower pot and intercepting Woodwards morning NYT delivery, Felt would have been at major risk of being spotted and connected to Woodward and Bernstein.
49 posted on 06/03/2005 6:21:06 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux; realman
"Um...no comment."

Good, because you're certainly not qualified to comment on one of our best and most accurate commentators.

50 posted on 06/03/2005 7:13:43 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The Lord has given us President Bush; let's now turn this nation back to him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hogwild
You're confused. If every law enforcement officer did what Felt did, investigations would be impossible, and the perpetrators would be able to see all of the evidence against them in the morning paper.

Nixon didn't betray the public, he was trying to defeat the scum that have taken over and destroyed this country. If Woodward and Bernstein cared about the country they would have confronted the president personally with their info, rather than using it to weaken the country.

51 posted on 06/03/2005 7:24:47 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The Lord has given us President Bush; let's now turn this nation back to him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: raygun

Bravo!


52 posted on 06/03/2005 8:11:26 PM PDT by CDB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

Lauer is a hack. When he interviewed Colson he failed to even mention what Colson had done in the Watergate scandal.
What we have is an ignorant populace being shoveled easy to digest news by media too afraid to bore or anger an audience.


53 posted on 06/12/2005 6:29:10 AM PDT by JRabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson