Skip to comments.
The Radical Lies of Aids
FrontPageMag.com ^
| June 03, 2005
| Jamie Glazov
Posted on 06/03/2005 11:18:37 AM PDT by FormerLib
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-215 next last
To: FormerLib
That is our point with the article..."The Big Lie" implies that it is safer to have unprotected heterosexual sex.
81
posted on
06/03/2005 12:22:14 PM PDT
by
Tulane
Comment #82 Removed by Moderator
To: Tulane
Ummm, this is a very stupid article...there are many studies showing that women can get aids from heterosexual intercourse. In fact, the largest group of people currently growing in number of infections is African American Heterosexual Women. lemming
83
posted on
06/03/2005 12:23:41 PM PDT
by
Clint N. Suhks
(WARNING: Exposure To The Son May Prevent Burning.)
To: spetznaz
In Africa, Asia and South America the major mode of transmission is loose heterosexual contact.Actually, that does not appear to be precisely true according to this article and, until the agenda-driven science is removed from the equation, it is unlikely that the truth will be known.
84
posted on
06/03/2005 12:23:43 PM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: Tulane
That is our point with the article..."The Big Lie" implies that it is safer to have unprotected heterosexual sex.Then your point is based upon your own faulty supposion as the article never even makes that allegation. It only correctly identifies the behaviors that are more dangerous.
85
posted on
06/03/2005 12:25:16 PM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: Tulane
Find them yourself, it won't be hard...aids spreads through all of the above, including vaginal intercourse, anal sex, and the sharing of needles...to suggest otherwise is foolish. You made the cliam Jackass, why should he prove your negative?
86
posted on
06/03/2005 12:27:06 PM PDT
by
Clint N. Suhks
(WARNING: Exposure To The Son May Prevent Burning.)
Comment #87 Removed by Moderator
To: Clint N. Suhks
There have been articles posted. Nice profanity.
88
posted on
06/03/2005 12:27:38 PM PDT
by
Tulane
To: FormerLib
They are all dangerous, my friend.
89
posted on
06/03/2005 12:28:17 PM PDT
by
Tulane
To: FormerLib
The article you posted seems to be agenda driven.
90
posted on
06/03/2005 12:29:04 PM PDT
by
Tulane
To: Tulane
Are the risks equal, medically speaking?
No, they are not.
To say so is to engage in a lie.
91
posted on
06/03/2005 12:29:39 PM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: Tulane
The article you posted seems to be agenda driven.It is called "stating the truth."
92
posted on
06/03/2005 12:30:26 PM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: FormerLib
"Another Left-bred bias was present a lack of realistic appreciation that African data can be tainted by widespread official corruption, as well as endemic poverty, ignorance, and superstition."
African data is not complete because most do not have health care and adequate testing. Imagine the numbers if poverty-stricken and the very rural were tested. Often in Africa, people die without knowing what caused the death. The numbers are not inflated, AIDS deaths are undercounted.
Every day, people (including many babies) waste away and die. Who counts the AIDS deaths in these bush communities with witch doctors counted as the medical professionals? You are right about superstitions. Sometimes when an African gets those purple legions, they are said to be "possessed" when they in fact have AIDS.
Imagine how many people died of cancer in this country when we were dirt poor and at the technological equalivalent that many Africans are today. What was listed as their cause of death? Does it mean we didn't have cancer in this country until the advent of modern day pollution?
To: FormerLib
But that's like saying ok, car crashes are not nearly as dangerous as plane crashes. So go ahead, have a car crash.
94
posted on
06/03/2005 12:30:53 PM PDT
by
Tulane
To: FormerLib
I think you are preaching to the choir here.
To: followerofchrist
What was listed as their cause of death?Most often, "consumption" or "natural causes."
Does it mean we didn't have cancer in this country until the advent of modern day pollution?
HUH? Is there some sort of contest for saying silly things in this thread?
96
posted on
06/03/2005 12:32:37 PM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: longtermmemmory
Not all of us are in his choir.
97
posted on
06/03/2005 12:32:43 PM PDT
by
Tulane
To: FormerLib
You already won that contest, my friend.
98
posted on
06/03/2005 12:33:11 PM PDT
by
Tulane
To: longtermmemmory
There's heathens in them thar hills, I tell ya!
99
posted on
06/03/2005 12:33:18 PM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: Tulane
No, I'll concede to you in that category after you demanded I tell some people that I've never met about their medical conditions (or lack thereof).
100
posted on
06/03/2005 12:34:37 PM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-215 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson