Posted on 06/03/2005 10:20:46 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
I beg to differ; it would have been reported today, probably just like it was back then.
The only difference would be that WE would make sure more than ONE SIDE was heard; we would have checked the facts and asked for sources.
The liberal media smoking weed again.
This is funny, and a little pathetic. For the left, Watergate and Vietnam was their heyday -- ever since then they've been dying to relive past glories.
Why post this garbage. No one mislead/lied to anyone. Everyone thought there were wmd's in Iraq. It is a good thing Sadam is gone. Bush may very well transform the Middle East...democracy may very well take root. Liberals have been on the wrong side of history for 60 years. Nothing has changed-bunch of sore losermans. Bush was re-elected...the American people would not stand for impeachment of a president who is in fact the people's choice (won a majority which Clinton never managed to do).
The 3 words you need to say to convince any braindead liberal impeachment is a bad idea is:
President Dick Cheney
This is what all the hub-bub over the prison "abuse" is all about. It won't just be the "abuse" of intel - it will also be the "abuse" of prisoners.
Rush said all during 2004 - if Bush wins again - they will do whatever it takes to impeach Bush.
Looks like the press is on to see if they can gin up enough support to force the House to bring charges.
to live in the past...
...and yet not learn a damn thing from it
there is NOTHING so blind as a dim
"Bring it on."
You are missing the point, "GET GEORGE BUSH AT ANY COST!"
It does not matter that Cheney would then be President. It would mean that all their crazy theories were correct and George Bush is really Hitler.
Dear STUPID liberal....
WE HAVE BEEN AT WAR WITH IRAQ SINCE 1991!
WE HAVE WAR PLANS AGAINST ALL OF OUR ENEMIES!
Reread your examples and ask why create the ground effort?
It's bad enough that we have Supreme Court justices citing foreign law in decisions, now we have media idiots citing foreign memos as grounds for impeaching a US president? When they find a whitehouse memo that says the evidence for WMDs is BS (even though that was never given as the sole reason for invasion), then we'll talk.
Quoting John Dean as a source for responsible information is something that makes this article laughable from the very outset!
I suppose that they wanted to quote an expert at lying and dissembling... You'd think that they'd want the very best, and go for the Clintons for that, rather than Dean!
Mark
Have you ever wondered what the liberal reaction to eliminating terrorist prisions would be?
Republicans control the House and Senate.
Bush impeachment = pres Cheney (or better yet--pres Rice (after 06))
No way.
Hey... these people are crazy. The MSM will gin-it-up for them and don't forget -- what counts... is the severity of the charge -- justice ain't got 'nuttin to do with it!
The story of these items which never existed now being missing is on HOUR 9.
Everything I needed to know about the media I learned from living through Watergate and the Clinton administration. Watergate was constantly bolstered with repetition and mock outrage, while the latter was twisted, watered down or totally ignored. When the press looks at itself today, 'objectivity' boils down to partisanship. It's been so far left for so long that the middle of the road is an alien landscape. The MSM is no longer capable of objectivity because it no longer can recognize it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.