To: durasell
So, given that, you would opt for a large percentage of the population to have no health insurance. This is a hugely dangerous situation, not only for those who would lose everything because of a major illness, but for the rest of us. There's a lot of nasty bugs flying around out there and I for one would like the guy preparing my salad at the local eatery to see a doctor regularly. We should not use government intervention to limit the free spread and competition among bugs. This would be the speciesism - a hate crime.
Besides, you prevent that way the natural culling of the more sickly and less fit humans. Freemarketeers will get angry!
47 posted on
06/03/2005 5:44:33 AM PDT by
A. Pole
(Mikolaj Rej: "A niechaj narodowie wzdy postronni znaja, Iz Polacy nie gesi, iz swoj jezyk maja.")
To: A. Pole
Besides, you prevent that way the natural culling of the more sickly and less fit humans.
As a point of interest, the flu of 1918 attacked mostly the most physically fit. They believe this was due to a earlier bug that passed through that infected the less fit and built up their immunity.
58 posted on
06/03/2005 9:45:32 AM PDT by
durasell
(Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson