Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rokurota

Guess I'm being a little stupid here but how does this protect them? You're implying there was no deep throat? They made it all up?

They hit too close to home several times not to have an inside source. The only rationale I can see for assigning one person as deep throat was that it made it more dramatically effective. If that's the reason they said there's only one deep throat it won't necessarily tarnish their image.


22 posted on 06/02/2005 9:23:43 PM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Arkie2
They hit too close to home several times not to have an inside source.

And they completely missed the mark a lot. It's amazing to me that reporters are considered great if they equal the proverbial broken clock. Printing one truth does not make up for ten lies.

23 posted on 06/02/2005 9:27:03 PM PDT by Rokurota (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Arkie2
...there was no deep throat? They made it all up?

"Deep Throat" may have been fictitious composite figure used by Woodward and Bernstein as a cover for every leak that they acquired from every source.

24 posted on 06/02/2005 9:31:19 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson