LOL. Why should anyone go to the government websites and find out for themselves? We have hedgetrimmer to misinterpret them for us.
Can anyone point me to a case where an illegal immigrant successfully argued that he is legal according to NAFTA? The way you guys are going on about this, and the echo-chamber effect on those that are unable to think for themselves, one would think that our courts are over-run with "legal under NAFTA" claims.
I'm beginning to suspect that your ilk doesn't give a damn about illegal immigration at all. You are simply tilting at windmills.
Why claim legal under NAFTA? Under NAFTA, our government ignores illegal immgration. Why go to court when you don't have to?