Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First they came for Howard Stern. Now they're coming for Cable TV.
http://action.downsizedc.org ^ | 5 8 05 | downsizedc.com

Posted on 06/02/2005 1:17:06 PM PDT by freepatriot32

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-182 next last
To: malakhi
Someone is forcing you to subscribe to cable television?

It's only a dollar for the first month.

Just like crack. ;-)

SD

61 posted on 06/02/2005 1:57:42 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
So change the d@mn channel if you don't like it.

How about instead people that want to watch the kind of filth Stevens is talking about go back to buying it in back alleys, etc....? You have your opinion, I have mine. Have a great day!

62 posted on 06/02/2005 1:59:08 PM PDT by yellowdoghunter (Liberals should be seen and not heard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

I agree. But if you don't like him, turn him off.

JUST SAY NO to Howweird Stern.


63 posted on 06/02/2005 1:59:28 PM PDT by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

This bluenose censorship stuff is a pretty pointless pursuit. The internet is quickly heading into the living room. I already have a computer and a modded Xbox/Media Center hooked up to my HDTV. Should I choose, I could be watching the most disgusting porn imaginable with two clicks of the remote. In the near future, the media will become super compartmentalized with Baptists watching, or rather recording, the Baptist channel, bird watchers watching the birding channel and so on. The smut is going to be there to so deal with it.


64 posted on 06/02/2005 1:59:58 PM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop

OMG! Did you hear him today? He was a real loon!


65 posted on 06/02/2005 2:02:20 PM PDT by stylecouncilor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter
How about instead people that want to watch the kind of filth Stevens is talking about go back to buying it in back alleys, etc

They are, in effect. Cable television is a for-pay system. Nobody is exposed to it against their will.

66 posted on 06/02/2005 2:02:43 PM PDT by Modernman ("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made. " -Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
In the near future, the media will become super compartmentalized with Baptists watching, or rather recording, the Baptist channel, bird watchers watching the birding channel and so on. The smut is going to be there to so deal with it.

The bit-delivery will be a matter of infrastructure, possibly even be a regulated monopoly, like phone or electric service. It's all a matter of what software to choose. If this were the case today, you would not have to accept Comcast's lineup of channels just cause they own the wire going to your house. A family-friendly package of channels would arise if there was an open market for such a thing.

Existing channels which are pushing the envelope might even control themselves better in order to gain entry into such packages.

SD

67 posted on 06/02/2005 2:04:03 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
It isn't just about changing the channel with these statists. They cannot stand the possibility that someone, somewhere, might see or hear something that is incongruous with their world view.
68 posted on 06/02/2005 2:04:51 PM PDT by FreedomAvatar (Gravity is only a theory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: FreedomAvatar
It isn't just about changing the channel with these statists. They cannot stand the possibility that someone, somewhere, might see or hear something that is incongruous with their world view.

It's a bit more general than that.

They cannot stand the possibility that someone, somewhere, might be having fun.

69 posted on 06/02/2005 2:07:29 PM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
"Conservative" activism in the name of one's "right" to watch porn? There's no God-given right to watch porno flicks on Cable tv.

Go sell crazy somewhere else---we're all stocked up here.

70 posted on 06/02/2005 2:07:55 PM PDT by Innisfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innisfree
"Conservative" activism in the name of one's "right" to watch porn? There's no God-given right to watch porno flicks on Cable tv.

We're not talking about God here. We're talking about whether or not the Federal government has the power to regulate what legal products a cable company can provide its subscribers.

Feel free to point out where in the Constitution the federal government has been granted that power.

71 posted on 06/02/2005 2:12:44 PM PDT by Modernman ("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made. " -Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: balrog666

Wrong. It's not so much what we as adults are exposed to, it's what has become commonplace that our children are exposed to.

AND the fact that WE have to pay the extra bucks in order to block such programming because it has become the standard rather than YOU pay extra to see the smut.


72 posted on 06/02/2005 2:12:48 PM PDT by redlocks322
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Jibaholic
Read my response again and you will notice that I say that you have to drop out of society and form a bubble around your children in order to instill good morals in them. ... The second problem is that being force to raise your children in a virtual bubble is probably not healthy.

Okay, I see what you are saying. I read your original post as advocating that sort of isolation from the mainstream culture.

73 posted on 06/02/2005 2:13:34 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: redlocks322
AND the fact that WE have to pay the extra bucks in order to block such programming

Why do you think you have to pay extra to block programs? I understand that the cable companies will provide blockers for specific channels if you desire so without charge.

SD

74 posted on 06/02/2005 2:14:35 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: redlocks322
Wrong. It's not so much what we as adults are exposed to, it's what has become commonplace that our children are exposed to. AND the fact that WE have to pay the extra bucks in order to block such programming because it has become the standard rather than YOU pay extra to see the smut.

Buy a clue - you are responsible for what you bring into your house.

Here, I'll make it simple for you: sell your tv and save a few bucks. Sell your radios and computers too - it's obviously too much responsibility for you to handle like an adult.

75 posted on 06/02/2005 2:17:40 PM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: redlocks322
Ever woke up in the middle of the night and turned on Spike tv? Nothing but infomercials for the "girls gone wild" videos... that's just one example. It's sickening.

I have insomnia, so I know what you mean. I "programmed out" all the melon-boob girls and the poker channels, so that when I'm channel surfing at night I won't see them. If I want to access one of those deleted channels directly during the day, I just punch the numbers into my remote; otherwise, they're not there when I'm channel surfing.

76 posted on 06/02/2005 2:19:32 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter
How about instead people that want to watch the kind of filth Stevens is talking about go back to buying it in back alleys, etc....?

The typical name for people who advocate regulating business products and practices is "liberal Democrat".

77 posted on 06/02/2005 2:22:55 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
The typical name for people who advocate regulating business products and practices is "liberal Democrat".

That's not really true on morals issues. I wouldn't say those advocating regulation of abortion are "liberal Democrats."

Neither would I say Byzantine systems for the control of alcoholic beverages, like here in PA, stem from "liberal Democrat" urges.

SD

78 posted on 06/02/2005 2:29:05 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter

"How about instead people that want to watch the kind of filth Stevens is talking about go back to buying it in back alleys, etc...."

Why do you care where someone else buys it?

Who is forcing you to?

Why not just unplug your tv from any antenna or wall, and watch nothing but My Three Sons and the Waltons on DVD?

How much of what you do in the privacy of your own home is anyone elses business?


79 posted on 06/02/2005 2:29:35 PM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: redlocks322

"AND the fact that WE have to pay the extra bucks in order to block such programming because it has become the standard rather than YOU pay extra to see the smut."

So unsubscribe from cable.

Imagine that, a company that caters to it's customers.


80 posted on 06/02/2005 2:31:53 PM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson