Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: netengineer
You might think that Clinton was corrupt but nobody was able to pin anything on him directly.

14 convictions, including a sitting governor (Jim Guy Tucker), in the Whitewatergate scandal. You really think the Clintons were able to swim around in that septic tank and not get any @#$% on them? They were just Slick Willy-er than the MacDougalls et al. You sound like Bruce Cutler telling us what a great guy John Gotti was and how there's no such thing as La Cosa Nostra.

Remember he wasn't convicted of ANYTHING by a Republican congress other than lying under oath about a sexual affair. It had absolutely nothing to do with corruption.

To this microsecond it amazes me how people have such crippling myopia about the dangers of a president having extramarital affairs, especially a guy who doesn't just occasionally stray but just can't keep his pants on to save his life.

If you were a government unfriendly toward the United States and you knew the American president was a pathological philanderer, what way might you choose to infiltrate the White House? Do you remember the scandal with the Marines at the Moscow embassy back in the 1980's? The Russkies sent hookers to bed them down and then blackmail them into giving up embassy secrets via pillowtalk.

Screwing around with any skirt that walks by -- especially with so much on the line -- is the heart and soul of corruption. Who knows what Clinton may have given up to spies and moles among his legion of dalliances?

Or is your version of the judicial system that you are guilty until proven innocent?

Not this line again! Mr. Cutler your objection is overruled on account of your client, Mr. Gotti, being dead and stuff.

(Whereas the lefty line is that Republicans are guilty until proven even MORE guilty...)

55 posted on 06/02/2005 3:01:47 PM PDT by Zhangliqun (What are intellectuals for but to complexify the obvious?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Zhangliqun

And I repeat -- Clinton's philandering created a hole in national security that spies could drive an armored division through. That is the issue nobody left or right seems to get.


74 posted on 06/02/2005 4:45:30 PM PDT by Zhangliqun (What are intellectuals for but to complexify the obvious?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson