Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deep Throat Also Leaked Information In Agnew's Case
TheWBALChannel.com ^ | 2:01 pm EDT June 2, 2005 | AP

Posted on 06/02/2005 1:00:50 PM PDT by show me state

Deep Throat Also Leaked Information In Agnew's Case Fmr. Md. Governor, Vice President Resigned After Tax Evasion Conviction

POSTED: 2:01 pm EDT June 2, 2005

BALTIMORE -- The former FBI official who revealed himself this week as Deep Throat apparently also leaked information to The Washington Post about two of the biggest stories in Maryland in the 1970s.

Post reporter Bob Woodward wrote in Thursday's paper that Mark Felt told him in the spring of 1972 during the Watergate investigation that the FBI had some information that Vice President Spiro Agnew had received a $2,500 bribe.

The tip produced no story, but Agnew resigned in 1973 upon his conviction for income-tax evasion. A Maryland judge found in 1981 that Agnew had accepted kickbacks as Maryland governor.

Woodward also said Felt was his source for a 1972 story about the investigation into the wounding of Alabama Gov. George C. Wallace in Laurel. Woodward cited "high federal officials" as saying there was no indication that suspect Arthur Bremer had been hired to shoot Wallace.

George Beall, the former U.S. attorney who prosecuted both Agnew and Bremer, said the leaks didn't hurt either case. He said the reported bribe to Agnew wasn't substantiated, and the Bremer story eased concerns about a possible conspiracy.

Beall said he's not surprised that Felt was the source of the leaks, since his high-ranking position at the FBI made him privy to virtually all the information the agency collected.

(Excerpt) Read more at thewbalchannel.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: deepthroat; feltgate; markfelt; spiroagnew
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last
To: cardinal4

I don't get it. The guy showed that he is nonpartisan and is just interested in good, non-corrupt government. Isn't that what conservatives stand for? Or is government corruption only bad when Democrats do it and not Republicans? Isn't that hypocritical?

Maybe you feel that breaking into an office for political advantage and covering it up is good government and a valid way of doing things.


21 posted on 06/02/2005 1:25:29 PM PDT by netengineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: show me state

Good grief, is Felt actually MD4BUSH too???


22 posted on 06/02/2005 1:26:26 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (NEWSWEEK LIED, PEOPLE DIED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: show me state
Could it be possible that Woodward and Bernstein wanted to keep deep-throat a secret because he had axes to grind and that he knew and THEY knew he was breaking the Law which would pretty much put them in the same basket as the people that they were blowing a whistle on? ie "We will break the Law so we can squeal on someone else that is breaking the Law, but we are better people and we will Lie because our cause is good and they are bad"

I think that the house of cards has stood as long as it can, now that any minor players (deep throat) can start huffing and puffing and blow it down so that the World can finally see what happened.

TT
23 posted on 06/02/2005 1:26:34 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeppelin

Are you really serious? Since when should either party be exempt from corruption investigations? When were was the left ever exempt? It seems that Clinton was the most investigated president. So where were they given an advantage? If Felt thought that nobody above him would investigate this problem then who would he go to?

If this occured to Clinton then you would be celebrating this guy! Please choose a consistent position.


24 posted on 06/02/2005 1:31:01 PM PDT by netengineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: netengineer
Maybe you feel that breaking into an office for political advantage and covering it up is good government and a valid way of doing things.

Maybe you feel that high-level law enforcement officials leaking information about investigations to the Washington Post is good government and a valid way of doing things.

The guy showed that he is nonpartisan and is just interested in good, non-corrupt government.

No, he showed that he is willing to act unethically in order to drum up bad publicity about his political partisan foes.

I don't get it.

Yep, you don't get it.
25 posted on 06/02/2005 1:35:19 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: netengineer
It seems that Clinton was the most investigated president.

Well I wonder why? Maybe it was because he was a corrupt, selfish pork-face. Nixon paid the price and did the right thing by resigning. Clinton worried more about himself than the country and refused to resign. And you want to lecture us on consistency?

26 posted on 06/02/2005 1:38:26 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy


I do think it is a valid way of doing things when nobody above him can be trusted. Who else is he going to tell?

How should he have proceeded?

Do you agree that breaking and entering is a good way to run the govenment?

Who said that these people were his political enemies? He didn't pick sides. He leaked info on both the Dems and the GOP.


27 posted on 06/02/2005 1:40:19 PM PDT by netengineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: show me state

Felt should die in prison, joined by his greedy daughter and family.


28 posted on 06/02/2005 1:40:20 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I wonder if Woodward is leaking to discredit Felt for being backstabbed.


29 posted on 06/02/2005 1:40:36 PM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

Trent Lott - Lt. Rotten T
John McCain - I'm Jan Conch


30 posted on 06/02/2005 1:40:59 PM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow ("Para espanol, marque el dos.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: show me state

What a creep.


31 posted on 06/02/2005 1:41:39 PM PDT by veronica (Never trust a Worm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: show me state
"The former FBI official who revealed himself this week as Deep Throat apparently also leaked information to The Washington Post about two of the biggest stories in Maryland in the 1970s."

Agnew had to be thrown over first so he would not become President. Too much 'plannin goin on out thar'. This was a team effort. Felt, Woodward and Bernstein were position players but who called the signals in this coup?

32 posted on 06/02/2005 1:41:47 PM PDT by ex-snook (Exporting jobs and the money to buy America is lose-lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
"I knew Beamer didn't do it... No middle name. All the good assassins have three names."

There'd be on question of his guilt if his middle name were 'Wayne.'

33 posted on 06/02/2005 1:41:58 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: netengineer
Maybe you feel that breaking into an office for political advantage and covering it up is good government and a valid way of doing things.

No, what I object to is the glorification of a senior law enforcement who broke the law, period.

I don't get it. The guy showed that he is nonpartisan and is just interested in good, non-corrupt government.

And THAT statement would make a cat laugh..

34 posted on 06/02/2005 1:43:13 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Extraordinary Circumstances- proving PT Barnum was right..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Why did Nixon resign? Because he got his hand caught in the cookie jar and was forced to. Otherwise he wouldn't have.

You might think that Clinton was corrupt but nobody was able to pin anything on him directly. Remember he wasn't convicted of ANYTHING by a Republican congress other than lying under oath about a sexual affair. It had absolutely nothing to do with corruption. Or is your version of the judicial system that you are guilty until proven innocent?


35 posted on 06/02/2005 1:44:53 PM PDT by netengineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

"George Wallace, whose segregationist policies were idiotic (but he was not a socialist), would have won the '72 Dem. nomination if Bremer hadn't shot him."

I doubt this is correct.


36 posted on 06/02/2005 1:45:06 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: netengineer

Nixon was his political enemy, big-time. Felt hated Nixon, which is why he went after him on the Watergate break-in.

He should have proceeded to let courts of law try crimes that were committed. Felt should have kept his mouth shut. The burglars were arrested and charged along with those who conspired with them, two of which were former CIA operatives.

Hunt and McCord had been heavily involved in black ops against communists. Nixon was very worried about that and the fact that they were blackmailing and threatening to leak sources and methods in the Cold War if they weren't paid off.

And no, Felt never leaked anything about the Dems, nothing about LBJ's "enemies lists", or JFK's affairs with mob chicks, etc. etc. etc.


37 posted on 06/02/2005 1:48:09 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

I know it seems surprising, but Wallace was actually leading in the polls when Bremer shot him. Consider who he was running against (Muskie and McGovern).


38 posted on 06/02/2005 1:49:56 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: netengineer

ha ha ha. As usual you young liberals have emotions but zero facts. Clinton lied under oath to a federal grand jury. That is corruption and a felony. Come back when you have some facts, son.


39 posted on 06/02/2005 1:55:22 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: show me state

liberal scumbag alert

http://www.freerepublic.com/~netengineer/


40 posted on 06/02/2005 1:57:22 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson