Well of course. My point is that if this woman stayed home to take care of her Father and it was her Father's money that supported them, so what?
If Felt suffers from some level of dementia as has been reported, it may be legal, but not right to manipulate/cajole/pressure him to make a decision he may not make otherwise.
Not eveyone in my family thinks the way I do. There were one or 2 who would hit my grandparents up for a "loan." They were successful until my mother & aunt caught on. The wrath of the daughters would fall hard & fall quick.
I believe in capitalism, don't get me wrong. But as much as I detest them, W & B are reaping the rewards of capitalism. There was no agreement with Felt, except to keep a secret. So the daughter did not think it was fair W & B got all the money? Well, life is not fair.
If Felt has full control of his facilties, fine...his life, his decision.
But if reports are true, he never wanted to go public with this and had to be "convinced" by his family after suffering a series of stroke and having diminshed mental capacity reeks of taking advantage of the elderly for financial gain. I consider that a form of abuse.
Please do not misunderstand. I am not taking up for any of them. I hold none of them in high regard. But the daughter holds the "no class" prize, IMHO.