I didn't make a judgement pro or con about her. How could I, I don't know her. I just made a statement based on the facts. The fact is she has taken care of her Father for 20 years and that was what my "judgement" is based on. You, on the other hand have made a judgement, and accusation, based on nothing. Zero. Zip. Ya know, you people are so insane, so full of conspiracy and anger and bitterness that you don't see how small and petty you appear. But maybe you just are small and petty.
Another point: if she took care of him for 20 years, she probably didn't work, in which case she has no income to fall back on when he dies (with the exception of a percentage of the pension, if RobbyL is correct).
Now, people who are in debt and looking at loss of income have a reason to be desperate and try to get some money. It doesn't mean she didn't take care of him, nor does it make her a villain. However, it would provide a motive for her to coerce him into confessing, perhaps even to confessing to something he didn't do.
And you must admit she was quite jolly when talking to the press.
lol.. if you care to observe my supposed "...judgement, and accusation, based on nothing...", you will see that Your Bias is my point of purpose. I have made no declaration here or anywhere else about Felt or his supposed caregivers. Take your "...Zero.Zip. Ya know, you people are insane..." bs and ruminate on the facts of your projected guilt post to me.