[SJackson]

Thank you, no. McHugh's comments, paragraph after paragraph, are relevant to something else, perhaps - but not the subject. He would do better to address the mistakes of neurologists and bioethicists in this matter, but is too full of his poorly developed science, and himself.

I don't know if he's discussing "mistakes", as opposed to a lack of knowledge, as I noted earlier. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.

[Layer Seven]

Well, actually, while I don't recommend YOU read the article, I am glad that you posted it. I was unaware how abysmally deficient were the sciences of neurology and bioethics. I mean, I knew they were BAD. But this bad?

Actually it was a GREAT posting. It's easy to see how "scientists" like McHugh are manipulated. I didn't appreciate it, until skimming his article. I promise you
though, I did NOT read it.

Best regards,
Layer Seven