Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ndkos

Stein was in St. Louis over election weekend. We were there to work in the campaign and spoke with him at the airport.

That said, his argument in this piece is absurd. We were losing in Vietnam before Watergate, and keeping Nixon in office would not have changed that, nor could Nixon have stopped the Khmer Rouge. The US was withdrawing from southeast asia in 1972, and Nixon was not going to further escalate the conflict into Cambodia.

If you want to look back, consider this: had Nixon not left office, we likely would not have been tortured by four years of Jimmy Carter, but we also would probably never have had a Reagan presidency. Some things turn out for the best.


74 posted on 06/02/2005 8:33:40 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Jedidah
That said, his argument in this piece is absurd. We were losing in Vietnam before Watergate, and keeping Nixon in office would not have changed that, nor could Nixon have stopped the Khmer Rouge.

We were losing in Vietnam? How do you figure that?

The United States most certainly did not lose the Vietnam war on the battlefield. U.S. armed forces won every battle of consequence, including the notorious Tet Offensive.

The war was lost in Washington D.C., when the Democrats abandoned South Vitenam.

93 posted on 06/02/2005 5:25:22 PM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson