Skip to comments.
Sikorsky to Build New, Faster Helicopter
AP ^
| June 1, 2005
| Lolita C. Baldor
Posted on 06/01/2005 4:05:59 PM PDT by Righty_McRight
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Sikorsky Aircraft announced plans Wednesday, June 1, 2005, to build a new high-tech helicopter that, propelled by a new rotor system, would be much faster than conventional models. An artist's undated rendering of the new helicopter is seen here. (AP Photo/Sikorsky Aircraft)
To: Righty_McRight
2
posted on
06/01/2005 4:07:17 PM PDT
by
tje
To: Righty_McRight
COunter rotating rotors allows for the removla of the traditional tail prop (to offset the centrifugal force), and replace it with a pusher prop. Cool.
Sounds like it has lots of promise too me.
3
posted on
06/01/2005 4:10:11 PM PDT
by
Jeff Head
To: Righty_McRight
And maybe there will be a new computer game too. I loved Comanche.
4
posted on
06/01/2005 4:11:28 PM PDT
by
TFine80
To: Thud
This is a coaxial compound helicopter.
It will be interesting to see if modern composites will allow it to be cost competative with traditional chopper lay outs.
The USMC would want a gunship version if it could keep up with a V-22.
Who knows, the V-22 may collapse and a USMC troop ship version of this bird may come to pass.
5
posted on
06/01/2005 4:13:54 PM PDT
by
Dark Wing
To: Jeff Head
But how do the rotors overcome ultrasonic problem?
Seems more to me like it's going to need push instead of rotor tilt, and be an airplane to some degree in fast flight.
6
posted on
06/01/2005 4:18:53 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(How are the ones and zeroes treating you today?)
To: Jeff Head
I wonder how its speed and payload lift capability is compared to the V-22 Osprey? Osprey is a lot complicated because it uses a pair of tilt rotors which lifts like a helicopter, but the engines rotate on the wing and eventually flies like a prop plane. Advantage is its horizotal speed. I wonder if this new helicopter design is alot simplier mechanically and computer software wise?
7
posted on
06/01/2005 4:20:09 PM PDT
by
Fee
(Great powers never let minor allies dictate who, where and when they must fight.)
To: Dark Wing
Who knows, the V-22 may collapse and a USMC troop ship version of this bird may come to pass. I think some type of improved helicopter is bound to replace the V-22. It is just too complex and expensive.
So9
To: Righty_McRight
Goo news indeed . . .
9
posted on
06/01/2005 4:22:07 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: Righty_McRight
Sikorsky already built a helicopter like this in the 60's or 70'. It was called the ABC for Advancing Blade Concept. At high airspeeds the retreating blade loses lift with a single rotor. Twin counter rotating rotors eliminates this problem.
I saw the ABC fly at several airshows when I was a kid. Way cool memories. I'll see if I can find some pics.
To: Righty_McRight
subsidiary, Schweizer Aircraft....didn't Schweizer build the Ag-Cat crop duster..................?
12
posted on
06/01/2005 4:31:48 PM PDT
by
spokeshave
(Strategery + Schardenfreude = Stratenschardenfreudery)
To: Righty_McRight
Here's a pic.
To: Righty_McRight; All
To: Righty_McRight; Aeronaut
This is one chopper that will never get off the ground- it isn't ugly enough to be repelled by the earth.
15
posted on
06/01/2005 4:58:04 PM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(End dependence on foreign oil- put a Slowpoke in your basement)
To: Righty_McRight
If they can turn that into a real helicopter, there would a surprisingly huge market for such a machine. Why? Because it would be perfect for use as an executive business transport to travel to outlying areas, and with careful rotor design it may be quiet enough to operate out of many airports with less noise abatement restrictions (maybe it'll even meet the British Quota Count 2 standard, the toughest aviation noise standard in the world).
To: Righty_McRight
Faster??? Why not buy the Osprey or do they also believe that turkey will never fly.
17
posted on
06/01/2005 5:13:01 PM PDT
by
cynicom
To: Righty_McRight
I hope the Pentagon will reconsider its plan to take Marine One away from Sikorsky and give it to a consortium of foreign manufacturers.
To: Squawk 8888; Tijeras_Slim; FireTrack; Pukin Dog; citabria; B Knotts; kilowhskey; cyphergirl; ...
19
posted on
06/01/2005 6:00:35 PM PDT
by
Aeronaut
(2 Chronicles 7:14.)
To: Squawk 8888
Actually, it looks like one of several Kamov designs. Igor, call your lawyer!
20
posted on
06/01/2005 6:04:09 PM PDT
by
Snickersnee
(Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson