Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE GOOD AND BAD O'REILLY

Posted on 06/01/2005 3:56:52 AM PDT by 7thson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: mariabush
You forgot hypocrite. O'Reilly rants against secularists ruining the morals in the country while having phone sex with his producer and offering to name her vibrator. Mr "Who's Looking Out For You", wasn't looking out for his own family. He is a phony.
21 posted on 06/01/2005 5:29:47 AM PDT by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: montomike

He appreciates genuine felafel, too.


22 posted on 06/01/2005 5:39:23 AM PDT by Sloth (I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
'I watch it because I do not think there is anything else on.'

I still watch it, too, for the same reason. Sometimes I do mute part of his show.

I have a different take on the Scientology segment. He did keep mentioning that you had to PAY for help, etc.

I did not know Greta was part of the cult. I am not surprised he did not mention that. He rarely mentions her at all.

There are times that I think he does not watch Fox at all - he will contradict what other shows have said/done. He is a pompous windbag - and no one had better DARE disagree with him.

23 posted on 06/01/2005 5:42:21 AM PDT by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montomike
"... aggressive phone sex"

What's that? You punch the numbers harder? You set the ring louder?

24 posted on 06/01/2005 5:45:35 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Jabba the Hutt's bigger, meaner, uglier brother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Very good. I will take your suggestion. Admin moderator - could you change the title of this post to read "The GOOD, The BAD & The O'Reilly..." Thank you.


25 posted on 06/01/2005 5:47:29 AM PDT by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a hundred pounds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

He was hitting the St Petersberg Times last night. One of the most biased papers in America. They are my hometown newspaper, and they make me ill.

Just seeing their headlines as I walk by makes me furious. I want SO MUCH to see their circulation drop. Their criteria for a front page story is, "Does it make conservatuves and Bush look bad."

O'Reilly is the first person I have heard in the media really take them on. And he minces no words about it. He called them "corrrupt" last night.


26 posted on 06/01/2005 5:48:25 AM PDT by I still care (America is not the problem - it is the solution..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The way I view O'Reilly is a guy that has no fear speaking his mind. He doesn't mince words with anything! That's what I appreciate about him and what I think makes him a solid analyst. I might disagree with his viewpoints from time to time, but I think that's what I actually like about him.


27 posted on 06/01/2005 6:56:49 AM PDT by Politics4Fun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

Your post, unfortunately, will be seen as flame bait.

There are scores of FR memebers who will not only stab O'Rielly and Hannity in the back, they will savage the bodies beyond recognition. Not content with just doing that, they will then proudly drag the bodies though the streets, proclaiming that somehow by their actions they have advanced the cause of liberty and conservatism.

O'Rielly, single handedly, and against all odds, took out Ali Arian (spelling is wrong, but he's the muslim-terrorist-professor from Florida). None of the slamming posters can claim anything that even approaches that, and yet, they carry on as though they are the saviors of the Union.

They ought to be so ashamed that they would change their names before ever posting here again.

I wish Jim RObinson would offer the same protection to O'Rielly and Hannity that he does to Rush. They certainly deserve and need it


28 posted on 06/01/2005 7:56:51 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

Not everyone agrees with O'Reilly on everything and that's a good thing. I don't agree with him on somethings but the best thing he does is that he inspires dialogue about important issues. And not just mindless dribble etiher, he offers well-thought out opinions that encourages others to think as well.


29 posted on 06/01/2005 8:10:16 AM PDT by outfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle; outfield
I understand what you are saying. I, at times, have been very upset with O'Reily. His treatment of the Swift Boat Vets and his personal thing with his producer has soured me on him a little. And I agree with you on what he did to that Ali guy. Also, he - as far as I know - is the first to shine the spotlight on Florida. The state seems to be a complete mess yet no one seems to be doing anything about it. He shined the spotlight on the children social services with the story of the missing toddler. Not one major news network picked that up yet he is accussed of being a racist because he dares to question and criticize the rappers and hip-hop music. He is at his best when he does this stuff.

Then, when he virtually begs for Dean, Kerry, and Satan's Prom Queen to come on his show, states the UN should be in charge of charity work, and other political innanities, he seems so bad.

I do not want to get into Hannity right now. He pisses me off on a daily basis. I know it is his program but a day or so ago he is mainly discussing Michael Jackson. Who cares and what does that have to do with pushing the conservative movement? Last week he is talking about the runaway bride and saying that he always thought something was wrong and she should pay back the city. Bull! He was stating people should leave her alone. Yesterday, he is discussing those who hire illegals and states he is with the guys who think it is not their job to check if someone is an illegal or not. He just says some of the most innane things possible.

30 posted on 06/01/2005 8:58:04 AM PDT by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a hundred pounds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
I wonder why he didn't even mention the Deep Throat story.

Actually, I don't wonder why. This show was promo'd over the weekend, and with the breaking news yesterday morning that the 30-year-old mystery was finally solved and O'Reilly made no mention of it, it was clear that yesterday's show was pre-taped and O'Reilly was caught absent by breaking news.

-PJ

31 posted on 06/01/2005 9:06:03 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

I agree with your reply.

I don't listen to Hannity either, for the reasons you listed, and others. You, unlike so many others here at FR, criticized him without beating him to death.

He IS on our side, yet to read so many posts at FR, you'd think he was worse than Kerry or Kennedy. It makes me very susupicious of those posters.


32 posted on 06/01/2005 9:39:25 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Well, I am not really sure why everyone is giving Hannity and O'Reilly so much grief. Why would you have to agree with everything they are saying. Both of them so conviction, which is something VERY unique in the world of journalism. I respect them for what they do, and I agree with them 50% of the time. The other 50%, i listen to what they say, becasue they usually have a decent point or two. Just becasue they might have a different approach to journalism, doesn't discredit their merit. I think they are saving the world of journalism right now.


33 posted on 06/01/2005 10:00:46 AM PDT by hardknocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: hardknocks

Agreed. The bashing doesn't help our casue one wit, and certainly damages FreeRepublic.

From time to time the powers that be at FR ask for new ideas to include in the software.

My wish would be to be able to 'tag' posters (it would show only on the readers computer, not on everyones), so that when I read a post and replies I could see "Hannity Basher" beside the name of the poster who I found was bashing earlier.

I'm suspicious of the bashers. I'm not convinced that they are here to advance, or even discuss, conservatism. Suspicious that many of them are simply trolls or Fifth Columnists here at FR.


34 posted on 06/01/2005 11:42:50 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

"O'Really" tonight asked Douglas Brinkley something like "do soldiers today have the heart that Army Rangers in WWII had?" Or something to that effect?

He asked it like he did not think so? Which I found nauseating!!


35 posted on 06/01/2005 9:04:39 PM PDT by Horn_Dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Horn_Dude
I heard that and did not like the implications of the question. Of course, never mind the fact we have Army Special Forces and Navy SEALS in todays Armed Forces. Forget the Marines of today. Sheesh! Where do they find these guys?

You know, as a Navy retiree and vet, I will be the first one to tell you that I did nothing glamorous, exciting, or heroic. And while I was not a screw up I was not exceptional either. Did my time, made E6, got out. Did better than my father did when he was in the Navy and better than my two brothers - one served in the Army and another in the Marines in the 60's. However, I have nothing but respect for Marines and soldiers. Hell, I have respect for Marines whose only excitment was boot camp. I consider getting through Marine boot camp a hard challenge. I do not know if I could have done it and I have the feeling the majority of these news people and talking heads - BO included - could have done it. To question the courage and honor of those in the service today is somewhat repugnant.

36 posted on 06/02/2005 3:21:52 AM PDT by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a hundred pounds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson