[Zivasmate]

An insightful article by one of the best. He takes a real well-earned slap at the Liberal intelligentsia, and as usual does not mince his words.

[sageb1]

He's a favorite of mine as well and something tells me, skeptic that he thinks he is, he isn't really.

[carumba]

...if that contrary view happens to be rooted in Scripture or some kind of religious belief system, the very public advocacy of that view becomes a violation of the U.S. constitutional order. What nonsense.

Now that is what I'm talking about.

[driftless]

It's not that libs don't want morals, it's that they want THEIR!!! morals (but don't call them that) to be the dominant morals of the country. Libs childish argument about conservatives or anyone else not "imposing" their morals on them can be easily refuted by simply asking a lib if he or she doesn't mind if you shoot them and their children. When they gasp that that would be a criminal act, merely ask them why. When they affirm that killing someone is wrong, ask them why. At some point they will have to admit to some sort of moral basis governing society. As soon as they admit to that, you have them...trapped by their own stinking (il)logic

[StonyBurk]

Problem is--though--with Bill Pryor of Alabama-the Honorable Roy S.Moore was much closer to the TRUTH and
to the rule of Law as a strict constructionalist than
the ambitious William Pryor. Moore was sacrificed on the
altar of political correctness.At a time when we are ruled not by law -but by the peculior structure of a court that is an oligarchy of despots.

[tm22721]

America is well served by keeping Democrats out of our pockets and Republicans out of our bedrooms.

BUMP