Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/31/2005 9:51:35 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Bonaparte
From the essay:

"It will no longer do to say, in other words, you have cited a foreign case, but I have cited a U.S. domestic case, and that is self-evidently better authority.

All that shows, should the judge be so inclined, is evidence of American parochialism. Roper tells U.S. judges, in effect, that they should strive not to be the Ugly Judicial American."

Wait a second. One World, One World Constitution?

2 posted on 05/31/2005 10:43:26 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bd476
Previous foreign or religious citations were done in the context of saying; "See, we do this and they follow our lead, as it is a decision grounded in the US Constitution"
Now it seems that is being turned on its head, with an argument that says; "They say this and we make the Constitution follow them"
Wrong and dangerous approach.
Zimbabwe? YGTBSM?
The Hague? YGTSM?
3 posted on 06/01/2005 9:46:17 AM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson