To: West Coast Conservative
That would be a mistake. I can almost see a Constitutional amendment prohibiting consecutive candidates from the same immediate family.
7 posted on
05/31/2005 6:41:13 PM PDT by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: ARCADIA
"I can almost see a Constitutional amendment prohibiting consecutive candidates from the same immediate family."
lol! Ya mean it wouldn't be fair?
14 posted on
05/31/2005 6:45:10 PM PDT by
sageb1
To: ARCADIA
Enough with the Constitutional amendments. Amendments limiting the presidency are undemocratic. If the people want a foreign born president or want a president to serve more than two terms, then it's their choice.
George W. Bush '08
REPEAL THE AMENDMENT THAT PROHIBITS A THIRD TERM!
To: ARCADIA
That would be a mistake. I can almost see a Constitutional amendment prohibiting consecutive candidates from the same immediate family. You think 25 years of a Bush or Clinton in the Oval Office or a heartbeat away is enough? Before the wives get a chance? Our system suffers from inbreeding.
42 posted on
05/31/2005 6:58:14 PM PDT by
SJackson
([Israel] should know that if you push people too hard they will explode in your faces, Abed, pai)
To: ARCADIA
Actually, if one is to go through that immediate family, his mother might be better. By all accounts she is extremely sharp and does not suffer idiots lightly.
110 posted on
05/31/2005 8:25:13 PM PDT by
GSlob
To: ARCADIA
That would be a mistake. I can almost see a Constitutional amendment prohibiting consecutive candidates from the same immediate family. Interesting, I could get behind that.
141 posted on
05/31/2005 9:35:28 PM PDT by
MilspecRob
(Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson