To: Bella_Bru
He should have used his ability and authority and arrested those committing criminal acts.He was too much of a coward to do that. Their family member was not only a rat...he was a coward to boot. Yeah...they must be real proud of those two qualities running through their veins.
104 posted on
05/31/2005 2:50:12 PM PDT by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
To: pbrown
I agree completely! IF he was so interested in Justice, then he should have come forward, in PUBLIC and made his accusations. Instead, he became a back-stabber and leaked information to a pair of leftist twits. I never like Redford and what's his name anyway and thought they were terrible reporters.
So there!
G
288 posted on
05/31/2005 3:54:43 PM PDT by
GRRRRR
(Hillary must never be President. Replace the RINO Seven!)
To: pbrown; Publius; Libertina
He was too much of a coward to do that. Their family member was not only a rat...he was a coward to boot. Yeah...they must be real proud of those two qualities running through their veins.So what's the major difference between the Nixon-Felt story and the Clinton-Tripp story? Felt had a duty to do something and didn't. Tripp had no duty to act but did.
And Tripp is vilified and Felt with be a hero.
528 posted on
05/31/2005 7:03:45 PM PDT by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
(You can turn your head away from the Berg video and still hear Al Queda's calls to prayer.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson