[bobdsmith]

Maybe I would treat your arguments more seriously if you weren't copy-pasting them without citing the source.

Misplaced fossils: "Evolutionists believe, for example, that the land plants didn't appear until over 100 million years after the Cambrian trilobites died out. Yet over sixty genera of woody plants, spores, pollen, and wood itself have been recovered from lowest 'trilobite rock' (Cambrian) throughout the world.

I call bullshit. No such things have been genuinely been found in the lower cambrian.

The problem with NS as the Theory of Evolution is: The only people questioning it, are IDers! It is a scientific corruption, not real science and devoid of scientific principle.

What is NS as the Theory of Evolution? And how exactly are "IDers" questioning it?

Nebraska man was a pig. Ramapithecus was a mistake. Peking Man Java Man Lucy

What are Java Man and Lucy doing in that list? They are part of the thousands of genuine transitional fossils. Its a shame you can only find less than a handful of frauds and mistakes amongst the thousands of genuines. You think Java Man and Lucy are the only fossil evidence for evolution of man? They are not. You probably haven't heard of most of the others because anti-evolution propaganda sites tend to keep quiet about them. Such is the problem with the BS of the "theory" of Intelligent Design.

[js1138]

Here's one source, but not the original...


http://www.case-creation.org.uk/palae6.html

[PatrickHenry]

Let's get all the "frauds" out of the way. In the 150 year history of this research since Darwin, the tens of thousands of scientists working in this field, and the millions of fossils uncovered, this is it. Maybe I've left out one or two:
Piltdown Man. Science (not creationism) uncovered the fraud.
Nebraska Man. It wasn't much of a fraud.
Peppered Moths. Another non-issue.
Haeckel's Embryos. Yet another.
Archaeopteryx. Despite howls from creationists, it's not a fake.
Archaeoraptor. A crude fake, publicised by Nat'l Geographic, then quickly exposed.
Lucy. The "fraud" claim is actually a creationist fraud.

Now then, contrast that to the frauds and lies on every creationist website.

[Dark Knight]

Natural Selection.

It is the theory we are talking about, right?

DK

Did you cite your last post?

Oops, we need a little more caffeine.