Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro

Gees VadeR, you are tedious, even for an imagined scientist. I've asked for a prediction from NS, and you can't give it. Theories, prediction...reality...scientific method.

Something future related. You're really good at not responding to questions. What does NS add to biology outside of morphology and taxonomy?

NS does not provide results. Why should we fund it?

The horse series looks like evolution. <<

NS. You do remember the theory we are discussing. NS and evolution are not the same. As a scientist, you can remember the difference between an observation and the theory...right?

You should be the first one questioning this article. Especially on the species definition. You did not.

Crappy science, crappy logic, crappy theory. That is why those IDers give you heartache.


DK

Who agrees with you?
Logical fallacy.

Occam's Razor is not a fallacy. The horse series looks like evolution. The challenge to people like you who do not accept it as what it looks like is to provide some rational alternate scenario. You are dodging. Why is that, since (BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!) you are not a creationist?

Ad hominem.

Occam's razor assumes you have a theory, and it is useful in prediction. Are you reading your responses...the horse series looks like evolution...not NS the theory.

Are the horses different species? Untestable theory is a fallacy...with a name.
http://www.datanation.com/fallacies/explan/untest.htm


572 posted on 06/04/2005 8:38:00 AM PDT by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies ]


To: Dark Knight
Who agrees with you? Logical fallacy

You are not stating Darwin's Theory of Evolution in a manner in which Darwin or any of his later students could agree with you. Agreement matters in this case. The fallacy is thinking you can have it any way you want.

One of us has to demonstrate some intelligence here and once again it's up to me.

I'm tired of making obvious corrections and having you simply repeat your dumb-as-a-stumpisms. Actually answer me on something to a level that might constitute an intelligent dialogue and I'll answer your answer. For now, you leave the attempt one intelligence short with your broken-record militant ignorance. I've got better things to do than play broken record with you.

576 posted on 06/04/2005 12:30:22 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson