Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
If the criteria is survivablity while providing CAS at night to some grunts slugging it out with the bad guys, the answer is yes

So you would argue that heavy and armored is good if the role requires it; and fast and unarmored is better in other circumstances.

Just like the sticklebacks.

305 posted on 06/01/2005 9:45:22 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]


To: Right Wing Professor

what did those planes evolve from? seems that the design of light armor and heavy armor both can serve the purpose that they were designed to do.

light armor heavy armor can be beneficial, but it already has the genetic info programed into it. now if you could show a fish Genus that never ever had armor to develop it you would have a better case.


307 posted on 06/01/2005 9:51:32 AM PDT by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

To: Right Wing Professor
Just like the sticklebacks.

Of course though I wouldn't argue thast specialization is always a plus.

423 posted on 06/01/2005 4:56:13 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson