Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueblazes
When you try to demonstrate your theory, you keep doing so with examples that are only variations within a species.

But since we know that changes occur that result in offspring not able to mate with the parent species it is technically a new species.

Like with the theory of continental drift, no eyewitness has seen one continent break up into two even though we can measure the drift of land masses. But Africa is always Africa and South America is always South America. Likewise we don't see frogs evolving into giraffe.

295 posted on 06/01/2005 9:22:07 AM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]


To: Dan Evans

We can see the process of land changes today, and we have been able to observe them for thousands of years. Islands rise and fall, lands that once existed are covered by sea, others are exposed. Lakes evaporate or are sucked up overnight. Tropical areas become desert and vice versa. Icebergs break from polar regions. Earthquakes and volcanoes produce obvious and dramatic changes in land. Even the recent tsunami in Asia was felt all over the globe literally (it shook the planet and I believe moved it a fraction). All of this is demonstrable and has been witnessed and measured repeatedly. Unlike evolution. There is no comparison.


300 posted on 06/01/2005 9:34:11 AM PDT by blueblazes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson