Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

64-bit upgrade is right move for Microsoft
Seattle Times ^ | May 30, 2005 | Mike Langberg

Posted on 05/31/2005 8:50:26 AM PDT by bedolido

SAN JOSE, Calif. — Sometimes true leaders must boldly proclaim a new direction to their followers, then walk off a cliff to prove their determination.

For me, that explains Microsoft's introduction of the awkwardly named Windows XP Professional x64 Edition.

This new version of Windows will almost certainly never attract more than the tiniest sliver of existing Windows users. And it will evaporate as soon as Microsoft delivers the next full Windows revamp, a long-overdue project code-named Longhorn, in the second half of 2006.

But I still think Microsoft is doing the right thing. Here's why.

Personal computing is undergoing a huge transformation from 32-bit to 64-bit processors. Most of today's processors, the brains of a PC, work with data in 32-bit chunks. Each chunk is made up of binary digits, either a one or a zero, in strings that are 32 bits long. The new generation of 64-bit processors gobble up strings that are 64 bits long.

(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.nwsource.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: 64bit; lowqualitycrap; microsoft; upgrade; windows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 05/31/2005 8:50:27 AM PDT by bedolido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bedolido

Wow! Microsoft is catching up with DEC.


2 posted on 05/31/2005 9:00:45 AM PDT by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido

If we say it never existed, it must have never existed.

How very Orwellian.

http://www.entmag.com/news/article.asp?EditorialsID=1467

64-bit Alpha on NT Dead, Too

by Scott Bekker

August 26, 1999

Compaq Computer Corp. officially notified Microsoft Corp. late yesterday that it was killing support for 64-bit Windows 2000 on Alpha, and Microsoft Corp. won’t keep development for its last remaining non-Intel Windows NT platform on life support in Redmond.

Earlier in the week, Compaq officials said they would end support and development for 32-bit Windows NT/2000 on Alpha after the release of Windows NT 4.0 Service Pack 6 (SP6). At the time, Compaq spokesman Steve Milmore was vague about how last week's decision to close the former DECwest facility in Bellevue, Wash., and how the layoffs and reassignments of about 100 engineers who worked on Windows NT-Alpha would affect 64-bit Windows 2000. Milmore said development of 64-bit Windows 2000 would continue on Alpha.

Alpha systems use a 64-bit processor.

Microsoft has said previously that it won’t deliver a 64-bit version of Windows 2000 until Intel Corp.’s first 64-bit processor, code-named Merced, ships in mid-2000.


3 posted on 05/31/2005 9:01:24 AM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4412

The Unibus yet lives!


4 posted on 05/31/2005 9:02:20 AM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Nemonix certainly thinks it does.

: ^ )


5 posted on 05/31/2005 9:05:35 AM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
But 64-bit chips alone can't do much. They need an operating system, and Windows XP, until now, has been strictly 32-bit.

Riiiight. With memory still built largely around 16 and 32 bit architectures and peripherals still built largely around (ahem!) 8 bit architectures, 64 bit CPUs and 64 bit OSs will still fit the general description of "can't do much."

But isn't IT marketing great?

6 posted on 05/31/2005 9:07:47 AM PDT by NCSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
From that point on, Windows x64 looked and functioned exactly the same as 32-bit Windows XP.

Wow, what an endorsement. It didn't function better? Faster? More efficiently?

Exactly the same?

7 posted on 05/31/2005 9:08:35 AM PDT by Petronski (A champion of dance, my moves will put you in a trance, and I never leave the disco alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido

Well, gee, seems interesting that MS is being called the leader here when IBM has been using 64 bit technology for at least 10 years now on the AS/400 (and others...)


8 posted on 05/31/2005 9:21:46 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Sega Dreamcast's OS and X are 128 bit operating systems.


9 posted on 05/31/2005 9:24:19 AM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate

OpenVMS and Tru64 UNIX on Alpha, and now on IA64.


10 posted on 05/31/2005 9:24:58 AM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Nice to seem the boys from Redmond catching up.
11 posted on 05/31/2005 9:31:13 AM PDT by Redcloak (Over 16,000 served.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido

<< Finally, a nod to the Macintosh. The current "Tiger" version of Apple's Mac OS X is a 64-bit operating system when running on Macs with the new 64-bit G5 processor, but drops to a 32-bit operating system when running on older 32-bit G4 and G3 processors. The combination of Tiger and the G5 is delivering today as much or more as Longhorn is promising in 18 months. >>

As usual Apple leads the way and WinDOS, with its poor emulation, follows.

And who knows where Apple will be when Microsoft eventually gets to where it has aleady left!


12 posted on 05/31/2005 9:44:31 AM PDT by Brian Allen (The government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem -- Milton Friedman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George Smiley

The last OpenVMS development I did (over five years ago) was on an Alpha 6000 series system. Dual CPUs, butt-loads of memory, acres of disk space. It was a screamin' machine. There were almost 100 developers using it and it hardly even flinched if a quarter of them submitted a big compile job at the same time.

I've been meaning to see if I can find one of those puppies lying about somewhere. I want to try installing the Alpha version of Linux on it. I expect that would make a pretty dandy computer.


13 posted on 05/31/2005 9:45:12 AM PDT by NCSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: George Smiley

He should be made to use Paper Tape Bootstrap Loaders. Yikes, those are some bad memories.


14 posted on 05/31/2005 9:49:24 AM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
He should be made to use Paper Tape Bootstrap Loaders.

I remember those. NOVA computers by Data General, circa 1973. You had to enter the boot program via mechanical switches. I think I had all 32 words memorized. Then you load the absolute loader tape, etc., etc, etc...

15 posted on 05/31/2005 9:56:04 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bedolido

I love my AMD64 Laptop and plan to upgrade to the 64 version of Windows soon.


16 posted on 05/31/2005 9:56:48 AM PDT by thebaron512
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCSteve

You don't need a box THAT big unless you just want to augment you heating in the wintertime.


See freepmail for details on OpenVMS hobbyist program.


17 posted on 05/31/2005 10:17:31 AM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
And who knows where Apple will be when Microsoft eventually gets to where it has aleady left!

Oooooh! Ooooooh! I know, I know! Pick me, pick me!!!!!

2% market share.

18 posted on 05/31/2005 10:26:55 AM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

<< 2% market share. >>

Hmmmm.

Not too shabby.

Especially for those of us who know the price of nothing and the value of everything.

Better even than Rolls Royce's!


19 posted on 05/31/2005 10:36:43 AM PDT by Brian Allen (The government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem -- Milton Friedman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Nice to seem the boys from Redmond catching up.

Yup. IIRC, Linux ran natively on 64-bit Athelons the day they were introduced.

20 posted on 05/31/2005 10:41:26 AM PDT by zeugma (Come to the Dark Side...... We have cookies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson