Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gridlock
Rightly so. This individual case may be tragic, but at some point you just have to say what is done is done and carry on, at least with regards to tangible property.

So, does this mean that the Swiss banks don't have to give back the money that Jews deposited?

15 posted on 05/31/2005 4:24:48 AM PDT by patj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: patj
So, does this mean that the Swiss banks don't have to give back the money that Jews deposited?

That's why I was talking about tangible property. A bank account is another matter altogether, obviously.

If some old NAZI had a Reubens hanging on the wall that he looted from some family during the War, I say give it back. In the famous case of Abe Simpson and Mongomery Burns Tontine vs Baron von Wortzenberger the courts rightly decided that since Simpson, Burns and the other members of his unit had personally looted the Flying Hellfish Treasure, they would be required to return the artwork to the idolent Baron even after decades had passed.

But that is not the case here. The British Museum was paying a party many times removed from the theft the going rate (at the time). They did not do anything wrong, here.

20 posted on 05/31/2005 6:01:45 AM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson