Skip to comments.
Reuters: Cigarette makers sought out women, study finds
Reuters ^
Posted on 05/30/2005 9:42:18 PM PDT by ThePretender
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Tobacco companies designed cigarettes to appeal to women's desires to be thin and healthy in ways that went "far beyond marketing and advertising," health researchers said on Monday.
They said internal documents released by tobacco companies under a 1998 court settlement show the companies created cigarettes, including "slim" and so-called "light" brands, in part to attract women.
"These internal documents reveal that the tobacco industry's targeting of women goes far beyond marketing and advertising," said Carrie Murray Carpenter of the Harvard School of Public Health, who led the study.
Writing in the June issue of the journal Addiction, Carpenter and colleagues said their study of tobacco company documents show a clear effort to find out what might make women want to smoke.
The firms also considered putting appetite suppressants into cigarettes so they could promote them as weight control products, they said.
"How unfortunate that the industry used these findings to exploit women and not help them. Cigarette designs and ingredients were manipulated in an effort to make cigarettes more palatable to women and to complement advertising allusions of smooth, healthy, weight-controlling, stress-reducing smoke,"
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: addiction; chimneypeople; filthyhabit; gulliblewomen; marketing; painfuldeath; pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: ThePretender
2
posted on
05/30/2005 9:42:55 PM PDT
by
international american
(Tagline now flameproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
To: ThePretender; international american
Tobacco companies designed cigarettes to appeal to women's desires to be thin and healthy in ways that went "far beyond marketing and advertising," health researchers said on Monday.Those SOBs. Hang 'em. Hang 'em high. I can't believe they were allowed to prey on our women folk. :) HA!
3
posted on
05/30/2005 9:46:01 PM PDT
by
writer33
("In Defense of Liberty," a political thriller, released in March. Buy it. I need new shoes. :))
To: ThePretender
"Carrie Murray Carpenter of the Harvard School of Public Health"
Well, Carrie Murray Carpenter of Harvard's School of Public Health. Whatever happened to your 4 year study from 1980-84 which proved second hand smoke is harmless.........
Maybe you should have gone to Yale, or Brown, or Dartmouth...: )
4
posted on
05/30/2005 9:46:44 PM PDT
by
international american
(Tagline now flameproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
To: international american
you beat me to it!
**YAWN!!!**
what else is new? A big company going for the mega bucks, they'd sell their kids if they could.
5
posted on
05/30/2005 9:46:44 PM PDT
by
1FASTGLOCK45
(FreeRepublic: More fun than watching Dem'Rats drown like Turkeys in the rain! ! !)
To: writer33
I am 51, and they have been printing "Cigarettes will ruin your life, spoil your wife, and kill your bay-bee" since I was in high school. Lawsuit shakedown on isle 4!!
6
posted on
05/30/2005 9:49:17 PM PDT
by
international american
(Tagline now flameproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
To: 1FASTGLOCK45
No, they would sell OUR kids.....
R O T F L M A O
7
posted on
05/30/2005 9:50:25 PM PDT
by
international american
(Tagline now flameproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
To: ThePretender
You've come a long way, baby....
8
posted on
05/30/2005 9:51:07 PM PDT
by
TFine80
To: international american
9
posted on
05/30/2005 9:52:19 PM PDT
by
1FASTGLOCK45
(FreeRepublic: More fun than watching Dem'Rats drown like Turkeys in the rain! ! !)
To: ThePretender
Using marketing? Those evildoers!
To: international american
I am 51, and they have been printing "Cigarettes will ruin your life, spoil your wife, and kill your bay-bee" since I was in high school. Lawsuit shakedown on isle 4!!You mean they won't? I can't believe I bought into the hype. I feel so dirty now! :)
On a serious note, I completely agree with you.
11
posted on
05/30/2005 9:53:19 PM PDT
by
writer33
("In Defense of Liberty," a political thriller, released in March. Buy it. I need new shoes. :))
To: ThePretender
Reuters: Businesses seek out markets in order to sell products, high school economics textbook finds.
To: ThePretender
I see al-Rueters is trying out their new economics editor. I assume when they print articles like this they are looking at the Florida FCAT results and playing to that audience.
13
posted on
05/30/2005 9:58:33 PM PDT
by
Tarpon
To: ThePretender
I drive through black neighborhoods and see Colt45 billboards.
14
posted on
05/30/2005 10:00:31 PM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(In God We Trust. All Others We Monitor.)
To: ThePretender
Once again class, cigarettes are a LEGAL product when sold to adults. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with using any marketing means to sell to adults.
If smoking is so bad, just ban the things and quit pi$$ing and moaning about those evil tobacco companies.
15
posted on
05/30/2005 10:07:09 PM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: SheLion; Mears
16
posted on
05/30/2005 10:08:47 PM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
To: ThePretender
How unfortunate that the political industry used these findings to exploit women and not help them.
All the women I know roll their own cigs. No additives and they taste better.
18
posted on
05/30/2005 10:24:02 PM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
To: clee1
Now you know this would cut off the litigation gravy train. We couldn't have that, could we?
19
posted on
05/30/2005 10:29:52 PM PDT
by
Nachoman
To: arizonaconservative
Not any recently published high-school ''economics'' text, I'd wager; they're all of them Marxist or crypto-Marxist through and through. Must be one of those 'blasts from the past'.
:^)
20
posted on
05/30/2005 11:08:08 PM PDT
by
SAJ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson