To: Remember_Salamis
Well put. Some people may argue that there would be no difference in the state of affairs if it were repealed but your point is just one of the many cleansing effects that would prevail. More money hungry senators would be at the mercy of the states, essentially eliminating lobbyists from the senate. Maybe the power structure would be reversed from that of a collective union of states to that of one that champions states rights over federal govt rights. Perhaps its a dream but with enough committed individuals, anything can happen.
115 posted on
05/30/2005 9:46:54 PM PDT by
IronChefSakai
(Life, Liberty, and Limited Government!)
To: IronChefSakai
Another issue is the concentration of lobbyists. Under the 17th, all of the lobbyists are concetrated in one area: Washington. If it was repealed, they would be spread out among the 50 state capitals. This would make their lobbying efforts more difficult at a minimum.
116 posted on
05/30/2005 9:58:42 PM PDT by
Remember_Salamis
(A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson